It has been nearly 70 days since Prosecutor General Pam Bondi promised the public to release the files in the Jeffrey Epstein case.
A skeptical remark was needed from the Supreme Republican Congressman to force her to explain why she did not follow.
“There are tens of thousands of Epstein videos with children or child porn, and there are hundreds of casualties,” Bondi told reporters in the White House on Wednesday. “And no victim will never be released. This is only the volume and this is what they are currently going. The FBI is diligently going through this.”
Bondi responds to the new doubts about the reputation James Commerity, the Republican Chairman of the Chamber Supervision Committee, who said he was convenient for Magas, that he did not believe that the Ministry of Justice had records detailed the case for sex trafficking.
“The Prosecutor General does not have them or she will overturn them. The president ordered them to be released, the prosecutor General ordered them to be released. We all know they were not released,” Commer told Benny Johnson in an interview broadcast on Tuesday.
Read more: Epstein files: What is public and what is still a secret?
Without presenting any evidence, the Congressman in Kentucky expressed fear that the Ministry of Justice officials in the previous administration destroyed the relevant documents that could remove political and Hollywood elites that contact Epstein.
But Bondi poured cold water on this theory, explaining that time – not conspiracy – was the reason why the files would not see the light of the day.
Introduced by Bondi’s comments, COMER’s assistant claims that “over the years, possible actors in the deep state within DJ may not have retained all Epstein documents.”
Bondi last promised to launch Epstein files in February, mentioning that the disclosure would include “many flights, many names.” But the next day, documents distributed on a handful of right influences consisted of a large extent available materials offering some new information.
The Prosecutor General then accused New York’s office in New York for giving up thousands of pages, ordering the transfer of a “truck” of documents that the FBI for review.
Conservatives quickly laminated Bondi for disturbed promises.
“The thing with Epstein’s files was a disaster. They were embarrassed. They stepped on a rake for no apparent reason,” says Megin Kelly, a Trump administration loyal cheerleader at the time.
The case Epstein received a new control of a new control last month after the obvious suicide of Virginia Jufre, which gave major testimony that revealed the degree of Epstein’s Sex Traffic Network. Jufre’s trial against Epstein’s friend Ghislaine Maxwell has led to the reflection of numerous court documents, throwing more light on Epstein operations and associations.
Epstein has been reported to have taken his own life in a prison cage in New York, and Maxwell is currently closed in a correctional in Talahasi, serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking and Epstein crimes.
Glenn Greenwald, the journalist’s advocate and civil liberties, publishes on Wednesday that he is taking Bondi with her word that the FBI is reviewing tranche of videos, but added that he should reveal whether Epstein has any relationship with the government.
Alexander Acosta, the former US lawyer in Florida, who led Epstein’s 2008 legal legal basis, reports that during his inspection of Trump’s administrative position, he was told that Epstein “belonged to intelligence”.
“However, we have to understand – and quickly – if Epstein works with or for any specific intelligence agencies,” Greenwald said.